Investors & Whales
Institutional-grade exposure to a fully modeled, DAO-governed crypto economy
Back the world where macros are on-chain and the central bank is a DAO.
Tiledom is not another reflexive farm token. It is a deliberately under-levered, fully modeled on-chain economy with observable token velocity, explicit sinks, capped supply and a protocol-controlled treasury. If GameFi 1.0 was yield-chasing, Tiledom is macroeconomic infrastructure.
- Hard cap 10M TILE, adaptive 3–8% gross monthly inflation, 3–5% monthly burns.
- 1M heterogeneous NFT land tiles as yield-bearing primitives.
- DAO-governed monetary policy, treasury lending and AMM liquidity.
Why Tiledom is an investable primitive, not just a game.
Endogenous demand, not ponzinomics.
TILE is required for land repair, crafting, treasury loans, AMM fees and eventual fiat bridges. Every meaningful action consumes or routes value through the token; there is no idle inflation for its own sake.
Transparent monetary policy with guardrails.
Issuance is algorithmic, parametrized by token velocity and engagement. The DAO can vote within bounded ranges, but cannot silently print its way out of trouble.
Research-first, narrative-second.
The economic model is grounded in explicit formulas and simulations (see whitepaper). We ship the lab before we ship the marketing.
Token distribution and vesting
Community rewards
40%400,000 TILE streamed over 12 months to active players via extraction, crafting and governance participation.
Treasury reserves
25%250,000 TILE for lending, AMM liquidity and strategic stabilization, governed by the DAO.
Team & contributors
20%200,000 TILE with 6‑month cliff and 18‑month linear vest; no team unlocks before the economy has real data.
Investors / strategic partners
10%100,000 TILE with 3‑month cliff and 15‑month linear vest; no instant unlocks, no private dumping.
Initial liquidity
5%50,000 TILE paired with base assets to seed AMM pools; LP tokens locked by the DAO.
Investment entry points
Seed Round – Ghost Economy
Equity + tokens$25k–$100k
- Allocation in the initial 10% investor bucket with 3‑month cliff and 18‑month vest.
- Direct access to the core team for economic design reviews.
- Priority participation in private testnets and parameter experiments.
SAFT / SAFE-style arrangement; jurisdiction and structure to be finalized with counsel.
Strategic Partner – Mainnet Launch
Strategic$100k–$500k
- Larger allocation within the 10% investor bucket, subject to the same vesting constraints.
- Dedicated governance seat in an early-stage multisig until DAO bootstraps.
- Ability to co-fund liquidity pools and share AMM fees with the treasury.
Custom strategic agreement; must be aligned with long-run protocol health.
Whale Allocation – Matrix Endgame
Whale$500k+
- Long-dated, vesting-heavy exposure with explicit on-chain vesting contracts.
- Co-design of real-world integrations (fiat rails, RWA hooks, institutional vaults).
- Ability to sponsor AI research and policy agents that plug into Tiledom.
Subject to KYC/AML and jurisdictional constraints; we prefer builders over pure speculators.
Dual rails: fiat + crypto
Fiat rails
- Phase 0–1: strictly crypto-native; investors enter via on-chain or OTC deals.
- Phase 2+: integration with licensed custodians for fiat on-ramps and off-ramps.
- Support for corporate entities that require invoicing, reporting and custody segregation.
Crypto rails
- Self-custodied wallets on Solana or Ethereum L2 (MetaMask, Phantom, WalletConnect).
- On-chain SAFT-style vesting contracts for investor allocations—no paper-only promises.
- Protocol-owned AMM liquidity that reduces slippage and aligns incentives.
Data-driven growth trajectory
Phase 0 – Closed Ghost Economy
500 testers, symbolic TVL, deep data on token velocity and retention.
Phase 1 – Mainnet Launch
5,000 players, ~$100k fully diluted valuation, tightly capped liquidity.
Phase 2 – Full Economy
50,000 players, ~$1m–$3m FDV with organic, gameplay-driven demand.
Phase 3 – Matrix Integration
200,000+ players/citizens, multi‑asset treasury, integrations with external DeFi and RWA rails.
Is TILE a security?
We design TILE as a utility and governance token for a functioning economy, not as a pure investment contract. That said, classification is jurisdiction-dependent. We will obtain legal opinions and may restrict access in certain regions. Nothing here is investment or legal advice.
How do you avoid the Axie / ponzi curve?
Explicit sinks, capped supply, adaptive issuance and the absence of unconditional high-yield promises. Players earn by participating in a finite, fully-modeled economy, not by farming infinite emissions.
What is your runway and budget?
We target a 6–9 month path to mainnet with a $150k–$300k budget covering engineering, audits, legal and minimal marketing. Investor capital is primarily used for build, not for aggressive paid acquisition.
What does exit liquidity look like?
For players: organic token sinks and AMM liquidity. For investors: a long vest schedule and the possibility of secondary market trading once liquidity and compliance requirements are met. There is no promise of centralized buybacks or guaranteed yields.
How involved can investors be in governance?
Early investors can participate in multisigs and working groups, but long-term power must migrate to the DAO. We want sophisticated capital that is comfortable being outvoted by the community over time.
What empirical failures in GameFi are you designing against?
We take a research-driven view of prior cycles. Axie Infinity’s SLP showed what happens when a reward token has uncapped inflation and weak sinks; StepN’s GMT/GST dual-token structure concentrated value in one token while inflating the other; pump.fun-style fair launches proved that 100% unlocked supply plus zero utility equals maximal volatility and near-certain value destruction for late participants; Terra/Luna and centralized lenders like Celsius/BlockFi demonstrated the consequences of opaque treasuries and over-leveraged lending. Tiledom’s design hard-codes caps, on-chain vesting, conservative LTVs and transparent treasury rules specifically to avoid replaying those dynamics.
What economic fallacies do you explicitly avoid?
We avoid several recurring traps: the “buy once, earn forever” fallacy (capital goods always depreciate), the “first-mover extraction” trap (land is released in generations and old tiles degrade without maintenance), the gold-standard myth that a fixed-supply token is ideal for a transactional economy (it causes deflationary hoarding), and the idea that fair-launch equals fair-outcome (pump.fun de-bunked that thoroughly). Instead we target mild, adaptive inflation anchored to real economic activity, with vesting and policy rules that align long-term participants.
Is TILE a guaranteed yield or return product?
No. TILE is the medium of exchange and governance asset for a simulated economy with real risk. There are no guaranteed APYs, no promised buybacks and no central party obligated to provide exit liquidity. Returns, if any, come from the health and growth of the in-game economy and the decisions of thousands of players—not from a fixed payout schedule. Our commitment is to intellectual honesty and transparent modeling, not to underwriting investor returns.